DOJ Sues 12 Democratic-Run States for Refusing to Turn Over Voter Rolls
DOJ Sues 12 Democratic-Run States for Refusing to Turn Over Voter Rolls
View 10 Comments Post a comment

Americans across the country are asking a simple question: what happens when states refuse to follow federal election laws? Here’s a better question: why would any state want to hide their voter registration data unless they had something to hide?

For months, certain states have been stonewalling federal requests for basic voter information—data that federal law explicitly requires them to maintain and share. The pattern isn’t just alarming; it’s downright suspicious. And the implications for our democracy cut deep.

From ‘Daily Wire’:

The Trump administration on Tuesday took action against six blue states that it says have failed to comply with requests to produce their voter rolls…

“Accurate voter rolls are the cornerstone of fair and free elections, and too many states have fallen into a pattern of noncompliance with basic voter roll maintenance,” said Attorney General Pam Bondi. “The Department of Justice will continue filing proactive election integrity litigation until states comply with basic election safeguards.”

This week, the Trump administration’s Department of Justice finally said enough is enough. They filed lawsuits against Delaware, Maryland, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington for refusing to produce their statewide voter registration lists. Think about that—these states won’t even show their homework. Without these lists, federal officials cannot verify that states are maintaining accurate counts of eligible voters, a fundamental requirement under the National Voter Registration Act, the Help America Vote Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1960.

A Pattern of Resistance

The most brazen example? Rhode Island actually put their defiance in writing. According to court documents, the state sent a letter explicitly stating it “objects to providing” basic voter information, including driver license data and the last four digits of Social Security numbers used for registration. Their Attorney General Peter Neronha had the audacity to claim the lawsuit was “weaponizing” the Justice Department. Really? Since when is enforcing federal law considered weaponization?

Here’s where it gets interesting. In September, the DOJ filed identical suits against Michigan, California, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Minnesota, and New York. That’s twelve states total now facing federal lawsuits. Care to guess what they all have in common? Every single one is Democratic-controlled. What are the odds?

Legal Authority and Accountability

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon didn’t pull any punches: “States that continue to defy federal voting laws interfere with our mission of ensuring that Americans have accurate voter lists as they go to the polls.” She’s right. The Civil Rights Act of 1960 specifically empowers the Attorney General to inspect these records. This isn’t some newfangled Trump innovation—it’s been the law for over six decades.

The timing couldn’t be more critical. With 2026 midterm elections on the horizon, ensuring accurate voter rolls isn’t just fundamental accountability—it’s essential for maintaining any semblance of public trust. Every legal vote deserves equal weight, and that starts with knowing who’s actually eligible to cast those votes. Pretty basic stuff, you’d think.

These lawsuits represent something bigger than legal proceedings. They’re about defending the bedrock of American elections. When states refuse common-sense oversight, they don’t just break the law—they shatter public confidence in the entire system. The Justice Department’s message rings loud and clear: no state gets to pick and choose which laws to follow. Election integrity isn’t some negotiable afterthought; it’s the whole ballgame.

Key Takeaways

  • The DOJ is suing 12 Democratic-controlled states for refusing to provide voter rolls
  • Rhode Island explicitly defied federal requests in writing, calling enforcement “weaponization”
  • Federal law requires states to maintain and share accurate voter registration data
  • Without transparent voter rolls, election integrity cannot be verified or maintained

Sources: Daily Wire, Fox News

December 3, 2025
mm
Cole Harrison
Cole Harrison is a seasoned political commentator with a no-nonsense approach to the news. With years of experience covering Washington’s biggest scandals and the radical left’s latest schemes, he cuts through the spin to bring readers the hard-hitting truth. When he's not exposing the media's hypocrisy, you’ll find him enjoying a strong cup of coffee and a good debate.
Cole Harrison is a seasoned political commentator with a no-nonsense approach to the news. With years of experience covering Washington’s biggest scandals and the radical left’s latest schemes, he cuts through the spin to bring readers the hard-hitting truth. When he's not exposing the media's hypocrisy, you’ll find him enjoying a strong cup of coffee and a good debate.