Leadership in America has always demanded clarity of thought and precision of language. When our elected officials speak, their words carry weight. They shape policy. They influence millions of Americans. This responsibility requires discipline and preparation.

During Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’ time in power, Americans witnessed a curious phenomenon during press conferences. Questions were asked. Responses were given. But often those responses left us scratching our heads in complete confusion.

The pattern became so pronounced that political observers coined a term for it: the “word salad.” These rambling, disconnected statements became a hallmark of one official in particular.

And now, current Vice President JD Vance has offered his theory on what might have been behind these bizarre communication breakdowns. Indeed, he’s suggesting that his predecessor Harris may have had “four shots of vodka before every meeting.”

The Pattern of Confusion

Former Vice President Harris became notorious for delivering answers that meandered without reaching clear conclusions. Her latest public appearance at an AI conference featured a bewildering tangent about ordering Doritos while watching the Oscars.

“We did DoorDash ’cause I wanted Doritos. And the red carpet part was about to start,” Harris began, before concluding with the perplexing statement: “But here’s the thing: At what point do we also uplift and highlight the consumer’s right to also expect — and you can debate with me if it should be a right — I think it should.”

What?!

The bizarre rambling prompted social media users to speculate she was “three glasses of wines deep” during her appearance. Let’s be honest – we all know what would happen if a Republican talked like this!

This wasn’t an isolated incident. In February, Harris attempted to deliver an “inspirational” speech to a Broadway cast that left everyone confused.

“When we think about these moments where we see things that are being taken, but also let’s see it, you know, nature abhors a vacuum,” she said at the time.

Vance didn’t mince words when he was asked about the differences between him and Harris.

“Well, I don’t have four shots of vodka before every meeting,” Vance said with a laugh. “That’s one way that I think Kamala really tried to bring herself into the role, is these word salads, and I think that I would need the help of a lot of alcohol to answer a question like Kamala Harris answered a question.”

Host asks VP JD Vance how he's doing the job differently than Kamala Harris.

JD Vance: "Well, I don't have four shots of Vodka before every meeting."pic.twitter.com/TlZ63J70yd

— Thomas Sowell Quotes (@ThomasSowell) March 20, 2025

A Question of Competence

While Vance’s comment was clearly made in jest, it highlights a serious concern about leadership standards. Clear communication isn’t merely a stylistic preference – it’s essential for effective governance.

When leaders cannot articulate coherent thoughts, how can they develop coherent policies? How can they represent American interests on the world stage?

The inability to communicate clearly suggests either a lack of understanding or a deliberate attempt to obscure. Neither possibility inspires confidence.

Vice President Vance’s administration has prioritized direct communication with Americans. The contrast couldn’t be clearer. One approach values clarity. The other confuses and deflects.

Perhaps most telling has been the mainstream media’s reluctance to question Harris’ communication difficulties. Seriously, would any conservative leader get away with this kind of incoherence?

Instead, Harris’ word salads were downplayed, excused, or ignored entirely. This protective treatment reveals the double standard applied to progressive politicians.

While late-night comedians occasionally joked about her rambling style, few serious journalists pressed Harris on whether her communication difficulties reflected deeper issues with policy comprehension.

California’s Looming Decision

These concerns take on renewed importance as Harris reportedly contemplates a run for California governor in 2026. As America’s most populous state, California faces complex challenges requiring clear leadership.

California voters must ask themselves whether Harris’ communication style indicates how she would govern their state. Would policy directives be as confusing as her public statements?

The stakes are high. California’s economy would rank as the world’s fifth largest if independent. The state’s water crisis, housing shortages, and economic challenges demand a leader who can articulate clear solutions – not more word salads.

Harris has set a summer deadline to announce her decision about entering the gubernatorial race. This gives Californians time to evaluate her record and communication style carefully.

Leadership requires clarity of thought and precision of language. The contrast between administrations illustrates a fundamental difference in governance philosophy.

In the end, effective leadership requires clear vision and coherent communication – not confusing word salads that leave Americans wondering what was actually said, regardless of what might have inspired them.

Key Takeaways:

• JD Vance’s humorous “four shots of vodka” comment highlights serious concerns about Harris’ communication abilities.
• Harris’ pattern of incoherent “word salads” raises questions about her competence for future leadership roles.
• Media’s protection of Harris demonstrates the double standard applied to progressive versus conservative politicians.
• California voters should carefully evaluate Harris’ communication style before supporting her potential gubernatorial run.

Sources: The New York Post