Nancy Pelosi picked Adam Schiff to make her case before the Senate. That’s right, Adam “Pencil Neck” Schiff.

The Democrat stood before the Senate for hours making one accusation after another against Trump.

He said it was the Senate’s responsibility to remove Trump to protect the 2020 Election—or else they may be participating in a cover-up for the President.

Obviously, he wants at least 20 Senate Republicans to trust him and vote with him. Even after he denied House Republicans their witnesses, now he seems to want the Senate’s respect.

But Jim Jordan just gave the American people seven reasons he thinks we should trust Schiff as far as we can throw him.

From Twitter:

Schiff:

-“More than circumstantial evidence” of collusion
-Nunes memo was false
-FISA process was fine
-The “Whistleblower” would testify
-“We haven’t spoken… with the ‘Whistleblower'”
-Parodied @POTUS‘ call
-“Mr. Z” referred to Zelensky

But today we’re supposed to trust him? pic.twitter.com/NELzVp2usX

— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) January 22, 2020

“Schiff:

-“More than circumstantial evidence” of collusion

-Nunes memo was false

-FISA process was fine

-The “Whistleblower” would testify

-“We haven’t spoken… with the ‘Whistleblower'”

-Parodied @POTUS’ call

-“Mr. Z” referred to Zelensky

But today we’re supposed to trust him?”

Wow. Jim Jordan, as usual, pulls no punches. Schiff has made many statements of “fact.” There have been so many, we find them pretty hard to keep straight.

But Jordan put together a short list of things Schiff seems to want us to believe at face value. Things that, to Jordan, don’t seem to hold much water anymore.

Schiff said there was “more than circumstantial evidence” of Trump’s collusion with Russia. But Mueller himself decided there wasn’t enough there to prosecute Trump.

Schiff went after Nunes, saying his memo was false. But Jordan says the DOJ has vindicated Nunes.

Then Schiff said the FISA process was perfectly fine. The the IG said there were definitely problems.

At one point, Schiff said the whistleblower would testify. Wait, did that happen? Oh, right, then he changed his mind.

Do you remember when Schiff said he didn’t have any contact the whistleblower? Then evidence came out that his office was in touch. So which was it?

Trump himself called out Schiff over his “parody” of the phone call with Ukraine, which he played straight until he got called out for it.

Most recently, Schiff was questioned for his statements over “Mr. Z.” Yet new context seems to make it look like he was wrong about which Mr. Z, and knew it.

Jordan is letting us see how many times Schiff’s credibility was questioned. His statements don’t seem to match evidence and facts.

Should Republican Senators trust him and remove the president from office?

Should the American people believe him?

SHARE to tell America and the Senate not to trust Adam Schiff!

Source: Twitter