In America, the establishment loves to tell us who our heroes should be. They prop up activists, praise politicians, and build monuments to abstract ideas they control. But real American heroes are chosen by the people—they’re the ones who speak uncomfortable truths, who refuse to bow to the cultural mob, and who stand on the firm ground of our founding principles, no matter the cost.

The media gatekeepers who think they own the narrative have always tried to silence these voices. But in the digital age, their walls are starting to crack. Every so often, a single word can light a match, bypass the censors, and spark a fire the elites cannot possibly contain. And that’s exactly what just happened. A single post captured by The Post Millennial laid it all out:

From ‘The Post Millennial’:

Elon Musk publicly endorsed a call for Charlie Kirk to be named “Person of the Year” after replying “Yes” to a viral post on X praising the Turning Point USA founder. Musk’s comment appeared under a November 24 post from user @Sassafrass_84, who wrote, “Charlie Kirk should be the person of the year. You can’t change my mind,” alongside an image of Kirk with the caption, “We still remember. We’re still fighting.”

The message couldn’t be clearer. Elon Musk, the man who runs X and was TIME’s own Person of the Year in 2021, just fired a shot across the bow of the entire media establishment. This isn’t just a news story; it’s a direct challenge.

A Tribute to a Fallen Patriot

To grasp the full weight of this, you have to remember the painful truth the media hopes you’ll sweep under the rug. Just over two months ago, Charlie Kirk was assassinated in a despicable act of political violence. This attack didn’t just rob the conservative movement of a brilliant leader; it stole a husband and a father-to-be from his family. They didn’t just silence a voice; they stole a future.

This call to make him Person of the Year is about far more than politics. It’s a posthumous honor for a patriot who made the ultimate sacrifice for freedom. It’s a powerful echo of the words from that original post: “We still remember. We’re still fighting.” It is a defiant roar that Kirk’s life, his work, and his sacrifice will not be erased.

Will the Media Do the Right Thing?

So, the ball is now in TIME Magazine’s court. Frankly, we’re not holding our breath. This is, after all, the same institution that gave the nod to climate hysteric Greta Thunberg, to the disastrous duo of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, and to vague concepts like “The Guardians.” Their history is one of promoting left-wing causes and anointing progressive saints.

The choice they face is a simple one. They can plug their ears, ignore the millions of Americans demanding recognition for a fallen conservative titan, and prove their award is nothing more than a partisan trophy. Or, for once, they can show a shred of integrity and acknowledge a man who, whether they liked him or not, undeniably shaped the national conversation and the events of this year.

More Than a Magazine Cover

Let’s get one thing straight: this isn’t about a glossy magazine cover. Awarding this honor to Charlie Kirk would be a stunning validation of the silent majority he so fiercely defended. It would be a powerful admission that the American values of faith, family, and liberty are not some dusty relics, but a formidable force that still defines this nation.

It would be a signal to the coastal elites that the ideas Kirk championed—the ideas that fill school board meetings and decide elections—cannot be canceled or buried. TIME’s choice isn’t really about one man. It’s about whether they’ll finally admit that half of this country—the patriotic half—actually exists.

The decision-makers in their Manhattan towers will make the final call, but the voice of the American people is resounding. The question is, do you agree? Should TIME Magazine honor the legacy of Charlie Kirk as its Person of the Year?

Key Takeaways

• Elon Musk has endorsed the late Charlie Kirk for TIME’s Person of the Year.
• The call is a tribute to Kirk’s legacy after his tragic assassination.
• This poses a direct challenge to the mainstream media’s liberal bias.
• Honoring Kirk would validate the conservative values held by millions of Americans.

Sources: The Post Millennial