For years Americans of all stripes knew that Bill and Hillary Clinton were dirty and up to their necks in corruption.
They’ve left a trail of deceit and wickedness wherever they went, throughout their political careers.
Perhaps nothing has been worse than the allegations that former President Bill Clinton raped numerous women. Throughout his life, while in positions of power, victims have claimed he abused them. Yet the liberal media said nothing.
Now it seems like one major liberal outlet is finally coming clean. What will this mean for the left?
From The Federalist Papers:
The New York Times has just released an article that finally condemns former President Bill Clinton for rape.
Back in 1999, Juanita Broaddrick came forward to say that in 1978, when he was Arkansas Attorney General, Clinton raped her.
Since then, leftists have regularly dismissed Broaddrick and other women who have accused Clinton of sexual abuse.
On Friday, however, MSNBC host Chris Hayes tweeted that liberals at “overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against him.”
As gross and cynical and hypocrtical as the right's "what about Bill Clinton" stuff is, it's also true that Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against him.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) November 10, 2017
Well, apparently the New York Times has finally decided that it will believe serious, reasonable accusations of rape, even when the rapist is Bill Clinton.
Times columnist Michelle Goldberg says she believes Broaddrick and “Bill Clinton no longer has a place in decent society.”
After all these years, the New York Times is starting to admit what we all knew about Bill.
Why now, though? It’s not because the newspaper is finally becoming honest. It’s because they no longer care about protecting the Clinton’s. They no longer hold any positions of power in the country, so liberals in the media don’t have to prop them up.
The New York Times has nothing to lose now in outing Clinton as a rapist. In fact, they can brag that they are being honest in accusing the man for his crimes. Even though they’ve refused to publish this story for over 20 years.
Let’s not let the New York Times off the hook. Sure, they are finally publishing this article. But that doesn’t erase the decades they were protecting an accused rapist, for politics.
It sure does humiliate Hillary even more than all the terrible things she has done for herself after losing in 2016.
Source: The Federalist Papers