Americans who’ve watched law enforcement flounder in blue states over the past decade recognize the pattern immediately. Defund-the-police movements gutted department budgets. Mandatory diversity seminars replaced tactical training. Officers learned to navigate sensitivity protocols instead of crime scenes. The results? Predictable. And devastating.

Now families across the nation are watching Rhode Island with mounting dread. A killer remains at large. The authorities tasked with catching him seem completely out of their depth. What’s unfolding in Providence should alarm every American who believes public safety isn’t optional—it’s foundational.

From The Post Millennial:

Providence Police Chief Col. Oscar Perez described the manhunt as “the most intense investigation going on in this nation.” Authorities are asking for the public’s help and have released grainy surveillance images showing the suspect walking before and after the shooting.

Reassuring, right? The nation’s “most intense” manhunt—and the best they can offer is blurry photos and a plea for public assistance.

Five Days and Counting

The Brown University shooting happened five days ago. Five days. Students remain terrified. Families demand answers. And what have Rhode Island officials delivered? At Wednesday’s press conference, Attorney General Peter Neronha dropped this gem: investigators have “zero information” regarding a possible motive. The suspect? According to police, he “could be anywhere.”

Absorb that for a moment. One of America’s most prestigious universities—an Ivy League institution—apparently couldn’t muster enough security camera coverage to track a murderer. The only images investigators have shared look like they were captured on a flip phone from 2004. President Trump didn’t mince words on Truth Social: “Why did Brown University have so few Security Cameras? There can be no excuse for that.”

He’s right. There isn’t one.

Police Chief Perez initially told reporters they’d “found no items of interest so far.” Then he reversed course, claiming investigators had actually “seized and found physical evidence.” So which is it? The contradictions aren’t exactly inspiring confidence here.

Woke Priorities, Weak Policing?

Here’s the uncomfortable question Rhode Island brass desperately wants to dodge: Have progressive policies gutted their law enforcement agencies’ ability to actually solve crimes?

Think about what police departments in liberal states have endured recently. Implicit bias workshops. DEI certification requirements. Community reimagining committees. Endless sensitivity programming. Hours and dollars that once funded investigative training now flow toward ideological compliance.

Rhode Island sits deep in blue territory. The state has enthusiastically adopted every progressive policing fad that’s rolled through. So here’s a thought: Could this explain why the “most intense investigation going on in this nation” has yielded essentially nothing after five full days? Were these officers trained to catch killers—or to memorize pronoun guidelines? Serious question.

The Camera Question

The security infrastructure situation at Brown might be the most damning element of this entire mess. During Wednesday’s press conference, a Rhode Island radio host lobbed an explosive accusation at officials. He claimed authorities had deliberately removed security cameras from Brown’s campus because of sanctuary policies—allegedly to avoid recording illegal immigrants.

Attorney General Neronha grew visibly irritated when reporters pressed him on the missing footage. “We are giving you the best evidence we can to identify this person,” he snapped. But hold on. If their “best evidence” amounts to a handful of pixelated images, that tells its own story about institutional priorities.

Elite liberal universities love lecturing ordinary Americans about justice and compassion. They position themselves as moral authorities on everything from climate policy to criminal justice reform. Yet when their own students needed basic protection, where were the cameras? Where was the security infrastructure any responsible institution maintains? Apparently, ideology trumped safety.

Time for Real Answers

The families of Brown University’s victims deserve more than press conferences filled with contradictions and excuses. The American public deserves to understand how a killer can vanish for nearly a week while authorities flounder. Rhode Island taxpayers deserve honest answers about whether their law enforcement agencies have become so captured by progressive orthodoxy that basic competence has eroded.

This isn’t some abstract political debate. It’s about whether the people charged with protecting our children and grandchildren can actually do their jobs. Until blue states acknowledge that woke policies carry real-world consequences—measured in unsolved cases and ongoing danger—tragedies like this will keep producing the same uncomfortable questions.

Rhode Island owes its citizens more than shrugs and surveillance photos. It owes them a killer behind bars. Anything less is failure.

Key Takeaways

• Rhode Island police admit the Brown University shooter “could be anywhere” after five days of investigation.
• Investigators claim “zero information” on motive despite calling it the nation’s most intense manhunt.
• Critics question whether progressive policing priorities have compromised investigative capabilities.
• Brown University’s lack of security cameras raises serious questions about elite institutions’ safety priorities.

Sources: The Post Millennial