It’s the interview that’s got everyone talking. Joe Rogan sat down with Donald Trump, and it was every bit as explosive as you’d expect. The episode has already racked up over 37 million views on YouTube alone, with millions more tuning in across other platforms. But here’s where things get murky.

Allegedly, Google, which owns YouTube, has been trying to keep the interview under wraps. Could it be that Big Tech doesn’t want Americans to hear what Trump has to say? With reports surfacing of difficulty locating the episode on YouTube, some are asking if Google’s algorithm is selectively filtering out content that might help Trump’s campaign.

And then there’s Kamala Harris. She hasn’t been on Rogan’s show, and despite an offer on the table, there are…conditions. The Vice President’s team reportedly offered a one-hour spot but wanted Rogan to come to her. For those unfamiliar, Rogan’s show usually runs for a marathon of two to three hours in his Austin studio, where he’s built his laid-back, conversational format.

But with all these conditions, some are saying it feels like Harris is dodging the interview altogether. And now, Rogan himself is setting the record straight on what’s going on.

From The Post Millennial:
Joe Rogan has clarified the reasons that Vice President Harris has not appeared on his podcast show like GOP nominee Donald Trump was able to last week, saying the Harris camp would like him to travel elsewhere from the studio and have only a one-hour timeframe, when his typical podcasts last around two to three hours…

“I strongly feel the best way to do it is in the studio in Austin. My sincere wish is to just have a nice conversation and get to know her as a human being. I really hope we can make it happen,” Rogan added.

Rogan’s Clarification on Harris’ Interview Conditions

Joe Rogan isn’t one to hold back, and when speculation started swirling about why Harris hadn’t appeared on his podcast, he took to social media to clarify. According to Rogan, it’s not that Harris’ camp outright refused to come on; instead, they laid down conditions.

Specifically, they wanted him to travel from his Austin studio and limited the session to just one hour. For Rogan, who’s known for his extended, unfiltered discussions, that wasn’t going to cut it.

“I strongly feel the best way to do it is in the studio in Austin,” Rogan said. “My sincere wish is to just have a nice conversation and get to know her as a human being. I really hope we can make it happen.”

The door isn’t closed on the interview, but it’s clear that both sides have different expectations on how it should go down. Rogan’s emphasis on wanting a real, unscripted conversation hints that he’s hoping for a deep dive, not a quick, controlled Q&A session.

Big Names Weigh In: Musk and Kirk on Harris’ Stipulations

Elon Musk, no stranger to controversial topics himself, chimed in on Rogan’s clarification with an enthusiastic response. “Good clarification. I would definitely watch that podcast,” Musk posted, making it clear he’s not only a Rogan fan but also curious about Harris’ unfiltered views—should she ever agree to a full episode.

Then, there’s Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, who took it one step further, saying, “America deserves 3 hrs with Kamala and Joe Rogan unscripted. Hope it happens, and she stops trying to dictate the terms. You have a format. It works. She should stop trying to change it. Just like America.”

Many conservative commentators and fans of Rogan’s show are echoing Kirk’s sentiment. To them, it feels like Harris might be creating obstacles rather than taking the opportunity to connect with millions of Americans through a popular platform.

With Trump’s record-breaking episode still fresh in viewers’ minds, some wonder if Harris is wary of the Rogan effect—where there’s no script, no teleprompter, and nowhere to hide.

Did Google Try to Keep Trump Off the Radar?

Then there’s the question of YouTube’s handling of the Trump interview. Soon after it dropped, users reported difficulty finding the episode directly through search. Instead of Rogan’s podcast, searches allegedly turned up coverage from other media channels, some with rather selective clips or takes on what was discussed.

The New York Post reported these issues, further fueling suspicion that Google might be playing gatekeeper with content deemed too controversial—or, in this case, too pro-Trump.

It’s not the first time Big Tech has been accused of censorship. During the 2020 election cycle, social media giants faced heavy criticism for their perceived bias and selective information policies. Many Americans are now wondering if this pattern will continue in the lead-up to 2024.

With Trump sitting across from Rogan and answering tough questions on everything from the economy to free speech, it’s easy to see why fans of the podcast want unfiltered access—and why Google may not.

Harris’ Missed Opportunity?

With tens of millions tuning into Rogan’s podcast regularly, Harris’ hesitance to engage in a full-length interview could be a missed opportunity. For many politicians, a conversation with Rogan has become a unique way to connect with the American public.

Trump’s willingness to talk with Rogan for hours on end seems to contrast sharply with Harris’ one-hour, off-site proposal. Rogan’s casual, in-depth format isn’t exactly friendly for soundbites and rehearsed talking points, but that’s precisely what fans love about it.

If Harris’ team was hoping to keep things short and controlled, they’re likely facing an uphill battle with Rogan. To put it bluntly, he’s not the kind of interviewer who’ll compromise on his format.

As Rogan said, he’d “love to get to know her as a human being.” For fans, that’s exactly what they want, too.

Key Takeaways

• Joe Rogan’s historic interview with Donald Trump hit over 37 million views, with allegations of YouTube filtering sparking backlash.
• Kamala Harris has yet to appear on the show, with conditions that deviate from Rogan’s typical format, causing speculation on her hesitance.
• Google’s alleged handling of the Trump interview has many wondering if Big Tech is quietly influencing campaign narratives in 2024.

Source: The Post Millennial