We all know this is true: some truths are so simple that defending them feels absurd. The sky is blue. Water is wet. Men and women are different. For generations, these were the bedrock certainties of civilization, the kind of common sense you didn’t have to think about. But here we are, living in an era where a radical cult has declared war on reality itself.
This fight is no longer contained on college campuses. It has infected our government and now contaminates the one institution meant to be the final guardian of reason and law: the U.S. Supreme Court. When our highest court takes up the definition of a woman, Americans deserve clarity and wisdom. Instead, what we got was a linguistic meltdown.
During recent oral arguments, one justice delivered a masterpiece of nonsense while trying to explain the legal issue at the heart of a case on women’s sports.
From ‘The Daily Caller’:
“You have the overarching classification, you know, everybody has to be, um, uh, play on the team that is the same as their sex at birth, um, but then you have a gender identity definition that is operating within that, meaning, a distinction, meaning that um, for, uh, cisgender girls they can play consistent with their gender identity, for transgender girls, they can’t,” said Jackson.
That rambling mess of jargon came from none other than Biden-appointed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. This isn’t just a bad take; it’s a demonstration of incompetence so profound it proves she is utterly unfit for the job. Her words expose an intellect captured by ideology, making her a threat to the integrity of the Court.
A Shocking Display of Incompetence
And honestly, can any of us say we’re surprised? This is the same person who, during her confirmation hearings, famously dodged defining the word “woman” by proclaiming, “I’m not a biologist.” That wasn’t just a clever sidestep; it was a bright, flashing warning sign of the intellectual rot to come.
Calling biological women ‘cisgender’ isn’t just an insult; it’s the Left’s secret-handshake vocabulary, a pathetic attempt to sound sophisticated while spouting nonsense. It reduces real women to a sub-category in their own sex. For a Supreme Court Justice to use this language is an open admission that she is not an impartial jurist but a political activist in a robe.
When Ideology Replaces the Constitution
Let’s call this what it is: a deliberate sabotage of the law. Title IX was passed with a crystal-clear purpose: to give biological girls and women the same shot at success in school and sports as boys and men. It was a victory for real women, grounded in the undeniable reality of biological differences.
By framing the entire issue around the make-believe world of “gender identity” and parroting activist talking points like sex being “assigned at birth,” Justice Jackson is trying to gut the law from the inside out. Sex isn’t assigned; it’s observed. Her refusal to accept this basic fact isn’t judicial interpretation; it’s a hostile takeover of the law to serve a fringe political movement.
The Poisonous Legacy of DEI
Justice Jackson’s disastrous performance is the direct result of the previous administration’s toxic obsession with DEI. She wasn’t the best of the best. She was a DEI checkbox, plain and simple. She was selected to satisfy a political narrative, not because she possessed a brilliant legal mind or a deep respect for the Constitution. This is what you get.
When you abandon merit and start picking judges based on identity politics, you end up with unqualified ideologues in lifetime appointments. Justice Jackson is the poster child for the DEI scam: a walking, talking embodiment of an agenda that prioritizes political correctness over competence, with disastrous consequences for our Republic.
This isn’t just about sports anymore. It’s about whether America will be governed by reality and the Constitution or by the whims of deluded ideologues who can’t even define what a woman is. The choice is that stark, and the stakes could not be higher.
Key Takeaways
- Justice Jackson’s reliance on activist jargon shows she is unfit for the Court.
- Radical ideology is being weaponized to subvert the original intent of Title IX.
- DEI hiring policies place unqualified ideologues on our nation’s highest courts.
- Protecting women’s sports requires an unwavering defense of biological reality.
Sources: Daily Caller
