You know, Americans, it feels like just yesterday we were fighting tooth and nail to get President Trump’s conservative judges onto the benches across this country. We knew how high the stakes were, and thank goodness we did. With President Trump back in the White House pushing the America First agenda, the Supreme Court has become an absolutely critical battleground, the last line of defense for common sense and the traditional values that made this nation great.

These justices, particularly the ones who understand the Constitution isn’t just a suggestion, are facing down the radical left’s relentless attempts to rewrite our laws and norms. From protecting our borders to defending religious freedom, the decisions coming out of SCOTUS these days have profound implications, often acting as a much-needed brake on the runaway train of woke ideology infecting our institutions. And believe me, the fight is far from over, especially when it comes to our schools.

Case in point: arguments were just heard at the Supreme Court in Mahmoud v. Taylor, a case out of Montgomery County, Maryland. Devout parents – Christian, Muslim, and Jewish – are fighting back because the local school board decided they couldn’t opt their kindergarteners out of lessons featuring storybooks pushing LGBTQ+ themes. The school board’s lawyer tried to argue it’s just harmless “exposure,” not coercion, claiming students don’t have to agree with what they’re taught. Seriously?

Exposing Kindergarteners or Coercing Them? SCOTUS Asks the Obvious

Thankfully, some justices weren’t buying that load of nonsense. Chief Justice John Roberts, bless his heart, pointed out the sheer absurdity of expecting five-year-olds to make that distinction. You can almost hear the common sense dripping from his question to the school’s lawyer:

From ‘The Post Millennial’:

“You said that nothing in the policy requires students to affirm what’s being taught or what’s being presented in the books. Is that a realistic concept when you’re talking about a five-year-old? I mean, you want to say you don’t have to follow the teacher’s instruction, you don’t have to agree with the teacher. I mean, that may be a more dangerous message than some of the other things.”

Exactly! Telling a five-year-old they don’t have to listen to their teacher? That’s the brilliant plan? Meanwhile, Justice Kavanaugh rightly questioned the school’s flimsy excuse that letting a few kids opt-out was suddenly “infeasible.” Infeasible, or just inconvenient for their agenda?

Hurtful Comments or Hurtful Indoctrination?

Justice Gorsuch zeroed in on the teacher guidance materials. If a little kid pipes up and says something grounded in basic biology, like “a boy can’t be a girl,” the teacher is apparently instructed to shut them down, calling the comment “hurtful” and warning against using “negative words to talk about people’s identities.” Gorsuch asked the lawyer point-blank: is that just “exposure,” or is that something more like coercion for a three- to five-year-old? We all know the answer, even if the lawyer tried to dance around it.

School Board Sneers, Parents Persevere

And let’s not forget the attitude of the school board members themselves. Gorsuch brought up their comments, dismissing concerned parents as merely “parroting their parents’ dogma,” suggesting they were “promoting hate,” and even linking their views to – wait for it – “white supremacists.” This isn’t about education; it’s about ideological activists disguised as educators looking down their noses at hardworking parents who just want a say in what their young children are being taught, especially when it conflicts with their deeply held religious beliefs.

Key Takeaways:

• The Supreme Court is hearing a crucial case where parents fight for the right to opt young children out of LGBTQ+ lessons.
• Justices rightly question if forcing these topics on kindergarteners is “exposure” or coercive indoctrination violating religious freedom.
• The case highlights the battle between parental rights and woke school boards pushing radical agendas while dismissing parents’ concerns.

Source: The Post Millennial