Fetterman Backs Trump’s DHS Pick Mullin, Calls It ‘Nice Upgrade’ Amid Democratic Opposition
Fetterman Backs Trump’s DHS Pick Mullin, Calls It ‘Nice Upgrade’ Amid Democratic Opposition
Be the first to comment Post a comment

President Trump demonstrated once again that accountability isn’t just a talking point in his administration—it’s a mandate. With the announcement that DHS Secretary Kristi Noem will be out by March 31, the president moved swiftly to name Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma as her replacement. Say what you will about Trump, but the man doesn’t tolerate underperformance. Washington could use more of that.

The decision sent shockwaves through the capital, but the real surprise came from an unexpected corner: a Democrat who actually put country over party. Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania wasted no time throwing his support behind Mullin’s nomination, proving that at least one member of his party understands that border security shouldn’t be a partisan football.

From Fox News:

Trump announced Thursday afternoon that he tapped Mullin to replace outgoing DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, who will leave the agency March 31. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., immediately threw his support behind Mullin’s nomination, dubbing the Oklahoma lawmaker a “nice upgrade” compared to Noem.

Fetterman repeatedly called for Noem’s ouster and said Thursday he was pleased with Trump’s decision.

“We’re in a different party, but this is the choice. I want to work together for making our America more secure,” he said.

A Democrat Who Gets It

Look, I don’t agree with Fetterman on much—probably most things, if I’m being honest—but credit where it’s due. The man didn’t just offer some tepid, poll-tested acceptance of Trump’s pick. He called Mullin a “nice upgrade” compared to the outgoing Noem. That’s the kind of straight talk Americans have been craving from their elected officials, regardless of the letter next to their name.

Here’s the thing: this isn’t a sudden conversion for the Pennsylvania senator. Fetterman had repeatedly called for Noem’s removal before Thursday’s announcement, and he’s been the lone Democrat willing to advance DHS spending measures amid a funding standoff that has paralyzed the agency. While his party plays political games with border security, Fetterman has consistently chosen pragmatism over partisanship.

His confidence in Mullin’s confirmation prospects reflects a simple reality: when you nominate a respected colleague known for getting things done, even political opponents can recognize quality. Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican who has bucked her own party on occasion, noted she has a “great deal of respect” for Mullin and is “OK” with the nomination. Funny how that works when you pick serious people for serious jobs.

The Party of No

Fetterman’s Democratic colleagues, meanwhile, couldn’t have provided a starker contrast. Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut immediately began issuing demands, insisting that Mullin would need to commit to “radical” changes in immigration enforcement to earn his vote.

Here’s a radical idea for Senator Blumenthal: maybe try supporting the laws already on the books before demanding new ones?

“Whoever follows Kristi Noem is going to have to be totally and radically different in their approach to running this agency,” Blumenthal declared, apparently unbothered by the irony of demanding radical change while opposing enforcement of existing immigration law. You have to wonder what exactly Democrats want from DHS at this point—other than for it to stop doing its job.

Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii offered the classic Washington dodge, saying it was “too early” to weigh in despite claiming to like Mullin personally. Senators Jack Reed and Elissa Slotkin similarly refused to commit. Slotkin’s hesitation is particularly rich—she voted to confirm Noem initially before souring on the secretary, suggesting her positions shift with political winds rather than principle.

This pattern of obstruction has become exhausting and predictable. Democrats demand bipartisanship in press releases while practicing pure partisanship in their votes. It’s a tired routine, and the American people see right through it.

What Real Bipartisanship Looks Like

Senator Fetterman understands how bad that is. He may disagree with President Trump on countless issues, but he grasps a fundamental truth that escapes many of his colleagues: some things are bigger than party loyalty. Securing the homeland is one of them.

More Democrats would do well to follow his example. Americans aren’t asking for Republicans and Democrats to agree on everything—that’s neither realistic nor desirable. But they are asking for leaders who can set aside the partisan playbook when national security hangs in the balance. Fetterman proved Thursday that it’s possible. The question now is whether anyone else in his party has the courage to follow suit.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump fired DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and nominated Senator Markwayne Mullin as her replacement.
  • Senator John Fetterman immediately endorsed Mullin, calling him a “nice upgrade” over Noem.
  • Most Democrats refused to commit or demanded “radical” policy changes before supporting Mullin.
  • Fetterman’s bipartisan approach on border security should be the standard, not the exception.

Sources: Fox News

March 6, 2026
mm
Cole Harrison
Cole Harrison is a seasoned political commentator with a no-nonsense approach to the news. With years of experience covering Washington’s biggest scandals and the radical left’s latest schemes, he cuts through the spin to bring readers the hard-hitting truth. When he's not exposing the media's hypocrisy, you’ll find him enjoying a strong cup of coffee and a good debate.
Cole Harrison is a seasoned political commentator with a no-nonsense approach to the news. With years of experience covering Washington’s biggest scandals and the radical left’s latest schemes, he cuts through the spin to bring readers the hard-hitting truth. When he's not exposing the media's hypocrisy, you’ll find him enjoying a strong cup of coffee and a good debate.