American higher education has become one of the most expensive cons in the country. Students borrow a collective $1.7 trillion – yes, with a “T” – to attend institutions that increasingly treat career preparation as an afterthought. Families who once trusted that a college degree meant upward mobility now watch their kids graduate with crushing debt and job prospects that barely justify a community college certificate. Somewhere along the way, the promise broke. The bill didn’t.
And the universities? They kept right on spending. New administrative wings. Freshly minted diversity officers pulling six figures. An ever-expanding catalog of programs that have far more to do with ideological passion projects than equipping young Americans to earn a living. Tuition climbed every single year while outcomes cratered, and Washington just shrugged. Nobody bothered to ask whether taxpayers were getting anything resembling a return on their investment – until now.
From The Post Millennial:
The Trump administration has introduced a new rule that will cut off federal loans for college students looking to earn degrees that do not pay well in the job market. The new rule was finalized this month by the Education Department, and boils down to a simple test: do you earn more after graduating from college with your degree than if you had never gone in the first place?
The move expands the gainful employment rule, and if college programs cannot clear that bar, then the program loses access to federal student loans and Pell Grants. Degrees in the humanities, social work, and the arts are set to be hit hardest by the rule change.
Let’s be clear about what that standard actually requires. Graduates just have to earn more than someone with a high school diploma. Not more than a surgeon. Not more than a software engineer. More than a person who never attended a single college lecture. The fact that programs charging tens of thousands in federally backed tuition cannot clear that basement-level bar is an indictment all by itself. A devastating one.
The Education Department will pull IRS earnings data and measure median income four years after program completion. Any program that fails the benchmark in two out of three consecutive years loses access to Direct Loans and Pell Grants, with the earliest cutoffs arriving in the 2028-29 academic year. Only about 4.2 percent of students receiving federal aid are projected to be impacted. This is a scalpel, not a chainsaw.
Woke degrees meet the real world
The disciplines staring down the barrel won’t surprise anyone who’s been paying attention: social work, art, religious studies, teaching aides, music, and cosmetic certification programs. These are the corners of academia where ideological fervor long ago replaced career development – where graduates discover, often too late, that a deep appreciation for postmodern theory doesn’t cover rent.
Here’s the number that should make university presidents squirm. Roughly 33 percent of programs at for-profit colleges are expected to flunk the benchmark. Compare that to just 3 percent at nonprofit and public institutions. For-profit schools have spent years peddling glossy degrees to vulnerable students while delivering outcomes that leave them financially worse off than before enrollment. This rule drags that racket into the sunlight.
Michael Itzkowitz, president of the education research organization HEA Group, nailed it: “For the first time in a very long time… institutions and college leaders are going to be held accountable. They are going to start looking and paying more attention to economic outcomes than they ever have before.”
The left’s predictable meltdown
Right on schedule, progressive commentators treated the rule like an existential threat to civilization. The New Republic breathlessly declared that Trump is “banning students” from taking out loans – a tweet that harvested over 30,000 likes from people apparently unbothered by basic reading comprehension. But peel back the performative outrage and ask one honest question: is it compassionate to encourage an eighteen-year-old to borrow upwards of $80,000 for a degree that leaves them earning less than their friend who skipped college entirely?
That isn’t education. It’s a shakedown. The people running these programs have hidden behind noble-sounding department names for decades while students absorb the financial wreckage.
Accountability is just the beginning
This single rule won’t repair everything rotting inside higher education. Tuition remains grotesque. Administrative bloat grows like kudzu. But for the first time, there’s a measurable consequence for selling young Americans a worthless product subsidized by the taxpaying public.
Forgiving student loans was never the answer – that just rewards the institutions that manufactured the crisis. Genuine reform demands that a college degree deliver tangible value. The Trump administration just laid down the first serious marker. The universities that can’t meet it have nobody to blame but themselves.
Key Takeaways
- The Trump administration will cut federal loans for degrees that don’t outpay a high school diploma.
- About 33% of for-profit college programs are expected to fail this basic earnings test.
- Only 4.2% of federally aided students face impact – targeted accountability, not a blanket cut.
- Lasting student debt reform requires demanding degrees deliver real economic value.
Sources: The Post Millennial